Let’s play a game – Part One

Do you like games?  How about match games or question and answer games? 

Well I like games.  Match games and question and answer games are two of my favorites.

I’ve developed a little Match and Q&A game for us to play together .  It’s called Who’s Responsible?

Here’s how the game works.  Over the next few months I’ll present information I have uncovered under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or email conversations.  I will then ask, Who’s Responsible?  For each correct answer you receive one point.  At the end of the game, sometime early next year, you’ll be the winner.

Part One contains four warm-up questions and five Who’s Responsible questions.

So, get out a sheet of paper and a pencil or pen.  After you’ve answered all the questions proceed to the Answers Table.

Let’s begin!

Question #1: What organization do the people in these pictures belong to? 

Number	Picture
. Number . 1
. Number . 2
. Number . 3
. Number . 4
. Number . 5
. Number . 6
. Number . 7

I know, that was a trick question.  Just wanted to see if you were paying attention.

Question #2: In picture number order, match the Board Member Name to the picture number.

Example: #1 = Joe Smith, #2 = Jane Doe, etc.

Names: Jane Wojtkiewicz, John Jekot, Walter Gluzkin, Janet Kaczkowski, Steven Levy, Tom Simmons, Sheila Urban.

More Questions

Question #3:	Who is the President of the Board?
Question #4:	Who are EMSD#63’s longest serving Board Members?
Question #5:	Which are the Board Member(s) who unquestioningly passed the 2010-2011 Budget?
Question #6:	Who are the Board Members who approved the 5 year Williams Contract?
Question #7:	Who are the Board Members who approved the non-transparent, 1 year, no-bid, no-written-contract, $108,000 Kathleen Williams employee/consulting/mentoring agreement?
Question #8:	Who are the Board Member(s) who do business with the District?
Question #9:	Who is the Board Member who received taxpayer funded pre-meeting dinners with Superintendent?

No cheating!

Answers Table

Answer #1:	EMSD#63 School Board
Answer #2:	#1, Walter Gluzkin; #2, Sheila Urban; #3, Steven Levy; #4, Jane Wojtkiewicz; #5, Tom Simmons; #6, John Jekot; #7, Kanet Kaczkowski
Answer #3:	#4, Jane Wojtkiewicz
Answer #4:	#3, Steven Levy (13 Years); #4, Jane Wojtkiewicz (13 Years); #6, John Jekot (11 Years)
Answer #5:	#1, Walter Gluzkin; #2, Sheila Urban; #3, Steven Levy; #4, Jane Wojtkiewicz; #5, Tom Simmons; #6, John Jekot; #7, Kanet Kaczkowski
Answer #6:	#3, Steven Levy; #4, Jane Wojtkiewicz; #6, John Jekot
Answer #7:	#1, Walter Gluzkin; #2, Sheila Urban; #3, Steven Levy; #4, Jane Wojtkiewicz; #5, Tom Simmons; #6, John Jekot; #7, Kanet Kaczkowski
Answer #8:	#1, Walter Gluzkin (WW Grainger); #5, Tom Simmons (A&B Bus); #6, John Jekot (Awards International)
Answer #9:	#4, Jane Wojtkiewicz

So, how did you do?  

The first question was a gimme.  The next three were warm-up questions designed to let you know who the characters are.  The last five questions preview some of the subjects to be discussed in detail over the next few months.

In the mean time, the next time you see one of your representative on the street, at church, or at the mall or wherever it seems appropriate, ask him/her about these subjects.  Ask about the contracts and the dinners on your tax dollar.  Don’t try to ask them at a Board Meeting, the Board doesn’t have to answer you.  Based on their rules, the Board doesn’t even have to listen to you.  In the mean time, let’s see what we can do about finding replacements. 

So let me help them along. 

Notice

Looking for a few good EMSD#63 citizens to run for the School Board.  No experience required, although some common sense, curiosity, integrity and leadership would be an improvement. Membership on this Board could be the most important thing you can do to guarantee a good education for your child. Email me at this site for assistance!

I have no further comment on this subject at this time.

President Wojtkiewicz, was Dr. Clay truly the best of the litter?

Madam President, was Dr. Clay truly the best of the litter or was your inability let go of Dr. Williams the reason behind your hiring decision?

I ask this question based on facts already delivered to me under FOIA.  I ask this question based on blog posts and comments written by Dr. Clay and from emails between Dr. Clay and myself.

Not long ago I wrote a blog post titled: What was the EMSD#63 Board Thinking?  When I wrote that piece I was still not sure of the Boards decision to support Dr. Clay’s style of leadership. His style being more open, direct and responsive than his predecessor.  If you’ve read my postings and comments, you’ll have seen the positive remarks I have made in that regard.  That said, I must return to the question. 

What is the EMSD#63 Board Thinking? 

Beside you Madam President, do any other members of the Board read what Dr. Clay writes?  Let me give you an example of the latest Dr. Clay authored email to flow over my transom.

Email - Transparency - from EMSD#63 Superintendent Dr. Scot Clay - 09-01-2010

The first thing I noticed was the absence of your email address.  The vast majority of Dr. Clay’s emails to me have included a “Cc: jwojtkiewicz@sd63board.org”. 

Madam President, I think you should read this email closely.  Remember, this is the guy you hired over 51 others.

Upon receipt of the letter, I invited several locally prominent stakeholders to tell me what they thought.  Let me share one of those responses with you.

“Dear Ken,

I think it's begging.

Quite frankly, if you and your blog and your agenda are so very transparent in a way that is uncomplimentary of your character, as Dr. Clay more than intimates, then why is he pridefully begging you off the case?  And doing so in a way that attempts to place you in a sort of catch-22; a private email, intended to remain private by express request, but suggesting you can't be trusted to honor his request while at the same time knowing, or he should know, the nature of your work IS to allow the public to view any and all District communications?

Again, quite frankly, if the District is a shining star of achievements with the amazing staff he is claiming, then he would not feel the need to spend one moment of his time refuting your accusations, nor addressing your complaints, nor begging you to back off.”

Lastly, someone needs to inform Superintendent Clay,who still thinks there were 100 candidates considered for the his position, that only 52 individuals submitted themselves for consideration.

Dr. Clay - 100 Candidates Considered

This is what the IASB actually said.  See page: 2 of 3.

IASB Presentation of Candidates - Apr. 15, 2010

Madam President, you’ve led this Board and District long enough. Besides, someone else on the Board deserves a chance to have those free (taxpayer-funded) pre-meeting dinners with the Superintendent.

So let me help you along. 

Notice

Looking for a few good EMSD#63 citizens to run for the School Board.  No experience required, although some common sense, curiosity, integrity and leadership would be an improvement. Membership on this Board could be the most important thing you can do to guarantee a good education for your child. Email me at this site for assistance!

I have no further comment on this subject at this time.

Thank you! - 2,000 Hits!

Dear Reader,

Butterly on Education recently passed the 2,000 hit mark.   Now for big bloggers, that’s nothing.  But for my very limited market and for the short time (since April 2010) since my return, that’s pretty good.  It means that you are interested in what goes on in EMSD#63 and it’s surrounding School Districts. 

Thank you again!  I’ll do the best I can to keep you informed, coming back and commenting.

Best regards,

Kenneth Butterly